Hi, On Tuesday 02 December 2008 23:09, Frans Pop wrote: > As there is no security support for backports I do not feel comfortable > adding this I'm sure people with said hardware would appreciate a working system with no security support over having a unusable machine :) And, as Martin said, bpo has security support now. > project-etchnahalf AT teams.debian.net > Not sure if anybody still really follows that list though (I have never > been subscribed to it...). I do :) And from the replies I got, I know others do. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgp3S9ndq8h7O.pgp
Description: PGP signature