Re: 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?

To: debian-publicity@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?
From: Graham Cobb <g+debian@cobb.uk.net>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:23:41 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200805171723.41200.g+debian@cobb.uk.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4d9251eaf02b74ed76cd5ed70d0c7dde@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 1210813870.3366.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 200805161117.09769.g+debian@cobb.uk.net> <[🔎] 4d9251eaf02b74ed76cd5ed70d0c7dde@localhost>

On Friday 16 May 2008 16:41:15 AndreMachado wrote:
> Could you, please, edit the Debian Times team guidelines [0], section for
> Press Releases, adapting it to the settled in house style?

I have made the suggested change, in line with my earlier proposal.

Graham

Reply to:

References:
- 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?
  - From: Andre Felipe Machado <andremachado@techforce.com.br>
- Re: 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?
  - From: Graham Cobb <g+debian@cobb.uk.net>
- Re: 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?
  - From: AndreMachado <andremachado@techforce.com.br>

Prev by Date: Be consistent, and just start writing [Re: 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?]
Next by Date: the openssl incident
Previous by thread: Re: 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?
Next by thread: Re: 3rd person singular neutral X 3rd person plural ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread