[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Debian representative for LinuxWorld (online mag)


Sounds good to me.... Go for it.

On 26-Jan-99 James LewisMoss wrote:
> I posted about this shortly after Atlanta Linux Showcase but no
> decision was reached.  (The conversation just petered out.)  The
> people at the Linux World magazine are looking for a Debian person
> they can send questions to every once in a while.  
> A bit later after the conversation petered out I send a message to
> Robert McMillan to see if anyone has said they would be willing.  He
> indicated that no one had stepped up to say they were the person to do 
> it.
> I'm willing to answer questions for Mr McMillan and would be willing
> to act in this capacity (in fact at the current moment I am).  If
> anyone would like to object and put forward a better person please do
> (my feelings won't get hurt :), but until there is some consensus I
> figured I'd continue answering questions for LinuxWorld.
> Dres
> -- 
> @James LewisMoss <dres@ioa.com>         |  Blessed Be!
> @    http://www.ioa.com/~dres           |  Linux is kewl!
> @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
> --  
> Please respect the privacy of this mailing list.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-private-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

* http://benham.net/index.html                                     <><  *
* -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------*
*    Darren Benham     * Version: 3.1                                   *
*  <gecko@benham.net>  * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++*
*       KC7YAQ         * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS--   *
*   Debian Developer   * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++   *
*  <gecko@debian.org>  * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+                            *
* -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------*

Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv


Reply to: