Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 13:33:54 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87y0v6q1u5.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20250508202008.naq2ycrcftcj6elv@illithid> (G. Branden Robinson's message of "Thu, 8 May 2025 15:20:08 -0500")
References: <aBuRb1vI_JBKRaJI@layer-acht.org> <20250508034941.GT28952@beskar.mdcc.cx> <aBxYRF6_-YU-Q0o4@an3as.eu> <20250508075447.7at5mxaywpfmiaeg@illithid> <aBxoAS_q5utRFFzc@an3as.eu> <20250508084908.2syhlqxbto6okke3@illithid> <[🔎] aB0HcM8GrGSriLer@iiec.unam.mx> <[🔎] 20250508202008.naq2ycrcftcj6elv@illithid>

"G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> writes:

> I agree.  We haven't established a precedent for the DPL's exercise of
> §5.1.5 power despite its availability for over 25 years.

Sam proposed several options in https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002
under §5.1.5 as DPL.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)              <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers
  - From: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?)
  - From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org>
- Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?)
  - From: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?)
Next by Date: Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers
Previous by thread: Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers (was: ITN procedure?)
Next by thread: Re: Categorially refusing to exercise DPL powers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread