Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying)

To: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying)
From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 19:15:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 26614.47452.669677.901166@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20250409144857.tdbclkgmuokzjsvw@illithid>
References: <26609.34677.122634.112081@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87r026b87w.fsf@debian.org> <1008440048.3485305.1743922917375@mail.yahoo.com> <26610.22095.193747.969471@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <875xjho7qi.fsf@ganneff.de> <bbc8210d-e40a-4ffa-ace2-0c7a677d85b5@urlichs.de> <Z_UgHGrHx8eHGlFi@layer-acht.org> <87friiglc0.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 20250409113335.fxpvxskrzmoacc5z@illithid> <[🔎] 26614.29812.489531.968203@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20250409144857.tdbclkgmuokzjsvw@illithid>

G. Branden Robinson writes ("Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying)"):
> At 2025-04-09T14:21:56+0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In practice, I radically underestimated the willingness of more
> > neurotypical people to perform the review (and if necessary
> > overruling) functions assigned to them in the Constitution.
> 
> You mean overestimated?

Yes.

Reply to:

References:
- a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying)
  - From: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
- Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying)
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying)
  - From: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Fluhion
Next by Date: Re: a Constitutional interpretation question
Previous by thread: Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying)
Next by thread: Re: a Constitutional interpretation question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread