Re: [draft] need your help on the AI-DFSG general resolution prepration
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 12:56:59AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> (5) what is the actionable outcome of this generaal resolution?
Is this actually unclear? The linked text claims this issue is urgent -
usually, something is urgent because some issue demands action.
> (6) is a neutral tone necessary for a proposal? I have a clear tendency
> throughout the texts.
I think it's okay to reveal a preference, but the "toxic candy" term is
rather unfortunate. You've defined the debate with terms that dismiss
the opposing viewpoint. Could you come up with a more neutral,
descriptive name?
Ross
Reply to: