Ilu left as an exercise for the reader: > If training data involves the core of a humans personhood - as mentioned > above - it cannot be open-sourced or otherwise free. Consent does not > matter. It belongs to that person and nobody else, period. I deeply > believe that there are borders we are not allowed to cross, no matter > how noble the cause. i'm not well versed in these debates, but why am i prohibited from opening my personhood? are you claiming i can't, for instance, distribute a generative approximation to my voice as an open system? that seems such a strange position to me that i suspect i'm fundamentally misunderstanding you. -- nick black -=- https://nick-black.com to make an apple pie from scratch, you need first invent a universe.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature