[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2



Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:

>
> I don't understand your argument that this decision is not in the realm
> of the ftpmaster activities. How could it *not* be, given they are the
> team deciding NEW queue acceptance, and that most notably they do so
> based on licensing aspects?
>

I didn't really mean to trigger a governance debate, just express that I
thought the decision at hand went beyond what I think of as ftp-master's
mission.

Policy 2.2.1 says "Every package in main must comply with the DFSG.",
and then points to the ftp-master REJECT-FAQ as "the project’s current
working interpretation of the DFSG." By "spirit of the delegation", I
meant "interpreting the DFSG".  For me training-data-less models are
clearly incompatible with the DFSG, so I am uncomfortable with
potentially accepting them as "interpreting the DFSG".





Reply to: