Hello Adam,
Am Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 05:35:52PM +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Sat, 2023-08-12 at 15:54 +0000, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > If I try to mail e.g. Marcos Fouces <marcos@debian.org>, this no
> > longer works. I get the following error message:
> >
>
> Contacting DSA is generally a better way to ask about infrastructure
> things than filing bugs on high-level pseudo-packages.
Thanks, then I know this for the future.
> > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> >
> > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es)
> > failed:
> >
> > marcos.fouces@gmail.com
> > host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [173.194.79.26]
> > SMTP error from remote mail server after pipelined end of data:
> > 550-5.7.26 This mail is unauthenticated, which poses a security
> > risk to the
> > 550-5.7.26 sender and Gmail users, and has been blocked. The
> > sender must
> > 550-5.7.26 authenticate with at least one of SPF or DKIM. For
> > this message,
> > 550-5.7.26 DKIM checks did not pass and SPF check for
> > [helgefjell.de] did not
> > 550-5.7.26 pass with ip: [82.195.75.114]. The sender should visit
> > 550-5.7.26
> > https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication for
> > 550 5.7.26 instructions on setting up authentication. v26-
> > 20020aa7d65a000000b005231f55294dsi4996663edr.385 - gsmtp
> >
> > The IP 82.195.75.114 resolves to
> > 114.75.195.82.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 114.64-26.75.195.82.in-
> > addr.arpa.
> > 114.64-26.75.195.82.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
> > mailly.debian.org.
> >
> > And of course, SPF/DKIM checks for my domain (helgefjell.de) fail for
> > this IP, which is @debian.org.
> >
>
> The DKIM signature warning has nothing to do with the forwarding, or
> the involvement of debian.org at all. The reason that check fails is
> that your mail has no DKIM signature, so obviously can't have a valid
> one. Signing your mail would probably make gmail a lot happier with it
> in general. (As a side note, the BTS breaks many common DKIM signature
> strategies, but that's a different issue.)
Sigh.
Directly gmail accepts it.
> The general issue is being worked on, as time and resources allow.
Thanks a lot!
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature