"Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> writes: ... > * It shouldn't need twenty people to make a point or start arguments and > counter arguments. If someone has already written what you would have wanted > to write, that's fine: in many cases you can safely leave it there. > The list is moderated: the volunteers moderating the list and everyone > reading the list will appreciate you for not providing more to read through. I'm a little concerned that this mention of moderation could give the impression that we're filtering messages based on tone or content. Unless I've misunderstood completely, we do not judge the content of the messages, except that we filter out very obviously abusive trolling that the list was suffering prior to moderation, and obviously drop SPAM/Phishing/etc. if we see it. As one of the moderators, I occasionally get the chance to approve/reject messages (on the rare occasions when the other moderators don't beat me to it). I've only rejected a handful of messages, and they were almost all obvious SPAM, and IIRC one trolling attempt from a throw-away address, not otherwise involved in the discussion. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature