Re: Questions around Justice and Our Current CoC procedures
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:18:15AM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote on 21/02/2022 at 07:30:48+0100:
> > BTW, also on that front, I think that announcing DAM warnings to the
> > project is a serious mistake. I understand the thought process that went
> > into that decision, but I really don't agree with it. The effect is to
> > make someone feel attacked and shamed publicly, which directly interferes
> > with the goal of a warning. It's also one of the major factors in making
> > people feel like warnings are some sort of permanent black mark against
> > them, which I strongly do not want to be the case.
>
> I agree. Warnings should be private at first. Some cases could be made
> public if the problem was big enough to be mentioned, but generally I'd
> expect as a random member to not be informed of a warning.
But please don't forget that a person vanishing from a heated discussion
just in a whim creates the feeling of victory in the orht discussion
parties.
And I KNOW what I would do as participant of a heated discussion after
receiving a DAM warning.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
Reply to: