On donderdag 9 september 2021 05:56:17 CEST Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:11 PM Diederik de Haas wrote: > > But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version? > > The other copies of it (in doc-debian and the doc directory of the > Debian apt archive) are all copied/built from the version on the > website. Thank you. Until you pointed out otherwise, I assumed the .txt version was the original/ authoritative version. > > Given that, is it wise to have the WML version as the > > authoritative one? > > At some point the website may switch from WML to something else but it > will be a lot of work to achieve. I should've made it explicit in my previous mail that I solely meant the Social Contract and didn't mean/intend to suggest the whole website should be in a different format. Cheers, Diederik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.