[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Funding Debian projects with money from Freexian's LTS service

I think it is really important that we find a way to accept funding like
this.  I'm fine if we  as a community have concerns about the specifics.
But free software isn't supposed to mean developers don't get paid, or
the software doesn't get funded (or even the software itself isn't
expensive although given the user freedoms you are generally able to
find someone to give you the source code cheaply).
Also, Debian is at a disadvantage, because we are not able to
effectively fund development in ways that other projects can.

I think it is important for us to find ways to counter those

Things I like about this proposal:

* The Debian Project is not choosing who to fund or which projects to
  fund.  There might be cases where we choose to do that, but for a lot
  of reasons we've discussed regularly that has a tendency to
  disenfranchise our volunteers and create uncomfortable power dynamics.

* Anyone with sufficient funding could do the same thing.  I think
  that's important, because it means that if someone doesn't like
  Freexian's approach, they can do their own.  yes, there are ways in
  which if you have more money, you have more influence.
  That's true in many areas of the world including in various ways in
  the Debian project.  Which brings me to the third thing I like:

* This process sounds relatively transparent.  It's clear who has the
  ultimate influence (money) and what procedure is being used.

There's one thing I don't entirely like, although I am not raising it as
an objection:

* It's too tied to LTS.  This is purely personal bias speaking here.  I
  personally would love it if over time either this proposal or some
  other group doing something similar managed to get sponsors who were
  less and less tied to LTS.
  I want to emphasize that this is not an objection.  Freexian is
  reasonably focusing on the market they have connected with and is
  doing a great job.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: