Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL

To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL
From: "Yao Wei (魏銘廷)" <mwei@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:43:12 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 639EDB9C-47C3-440F-8300-AF5FF8C6E91A@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20190725180615.GB9514@angband.pl>
References: <[🔎] 20190725180615.GB9514@angband.pl>

What if, one of the upstream authors consider it violating GPL _without_ the clause?  I mean, it could happen. 

Yao Wei

Reply to:

References:
- Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL
  - From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: Upstream metadata to help our users contribute back to projects we redistribute.
Next by Date: Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
Previous by thread: Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL
Next by thread: Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread