On Fri, 05 Jan 2018, Philipp Huebner wrote: > Hi > > Am 04.01.2018 um 16:57 schrieb Ximin Luo: > > I think it's preferable not to look at this from the point-of-view of > > individual teams, but from the perspective of the project as a whole. > > When non-Debian people navigate salsa.d.o it would be nicer to have a > > more systematic set of prefixes across all groups. > > While I like well organized structures, doing this on salsa alone is not > doing much IMHO, you would need to enforce the same policy for team > names in all places debian, which is a much bigger task/issue. > > > > <formorer> > >> infinity0: please don't expect us to do such a mass renaming. > > > > As above, I think the value of this exercise is to make the names > > consistent across the whole project. If you mean you don't want to do > > it out of effort, I'd be happy to do it - there's only about 100 > > teams so far, and I already supplied suggestions for about 12 of > > them. > > I hope no team name will be changed without the team(-owner)'s consent, > as that might drive people away from salsa altogether, which is not what > you want (I assume). Of course not. Every team will have to create an issue. (If we decide on such structure, I do really expect more than just a few mails). Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature