Debian's Code of Conduct, and our technical excellence
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Debian's Code of Conduct, and our technical excellence
- From: Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 16:23:02 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4030b427-9d9f-2886-aed3-8ba1ab2b0ef1@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20181229144333.kdug2up4rcz46asd@santiago.connexer.com>
- References: <4bdf5106-1e92-6267-3d61-6df2ef303f4b@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20181229020052.uywt3lczteemwnlg@srcf.ucam.org> <E1gdC5k-0003e9-Ra@drop.zugschlus.de> <1610152.qJUnmIiJDD@liv> <20181229144333.kdug2up4rcz46asd@santiago.connexer.com>
Hi,
There have a few posts in recent discussions by people suggesting (or,
at least, appearing to suggest) that there is a conflict between
technical excellence and our Code of Conduct (or aiming to increase the
diversity of our membership, or similar).
I think there is no such conflict, and that the idea that there is is in
itself harmful.
In particular, "X does excellent technical work, so we should turn a
blind eye when their violate our CoC otherwise the technical excellence
of the project will suffer" is both wrong and harmful. If we want to
achieve technical excellence, we will do so by having many talented
people working together. If we restrict our talent pool to "people who
are prepared to tolerate a toxic environment", then we are harming that
goal.
Our Code of Conduct is not an onerous restriction on behaviour, it's a
tool to help us build the sort of environment in which excellent
technical people will be able to do their best work.
Regards,
Matthew
Reply to: