On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Instead, DAM ruled a verdict, and influenced other people to the > point that "because DAM ruled" was given as a reason for other > measures. This was an unconstitutional abuse of DAM's powers, Regardless of anything else, this is not unconstitutional. The constitution gives the DPL the power to delegate decisions about approving and expelling developers; the DPL delegates this power to the DAM; thus any exercise of this power is constitutional. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature