Re: Support WKD (and WKS) for @debian.org email addresses?
Guilhem Moulin writes ("Re: Support WKD (and WKS) for @debian.org email addresses?"):
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 at 18:20:16 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Personally I think the hash is bizarre. Why make this protocol depend
> > on an obsolete hash function ? One could just url-encode the email
> > address. The server could deal with case-folding etc.
>
> Dunno if you'll find the arguments convincing, but FWIW this was brought up to
> gnupg-devel in May 2016: see https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2016-May/031068.html
> and follow-ups in that thread.
Huh.
Well, I followed the breadcrumbs to the spec and found an Internet
Draft. So I decided that the IETF's openpgp list was the right place
to make my comments.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/current/msg09100.html
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: