Re: Reasons for having DPL election terms 1 year
shirish शिरीष writes ("Reasons for having DPL election terms 1 year"):
> My query how did the idea of having yearly elections for choosing DPL
> come in place.
This was my doing. And, TBH, I don't think I considered other options
very seriously, although I haven't searched my email archives. (I may
not have email archives but maybe someone else does. The discussion
was probably on d-devel.)
Nowadays I think 1 year is still right. If the existing DPL is doing
a good job and wants to continue, they normally get re-elected. Our
election campaigns don't seem to be too much of a distraction. And
even a 1 year DPL term is a big commitment.