[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reasons for having DPL election terms 1 year

shirish शिरीष writes ("Reasons for having DPL election terms 1 year"):
> My query how did the idea of having yearly elections for choosing DPL
> come in place.

This was my doing.  And, TBH, I don't think I considered other options
very seriously, although I haven't searched my email archives.  (I may
not have email archives but maybe someone else does.  The discussion
was probably on d-devel.)

Nowadays I think 1 year is still right.  If the existing DPL is doing
a good job and wants to continue, they normally get re-elected.  Our
election campaigns don't seem to be too much of a distraction.  And
even a 1 year DPL term is a big commitment.


Reply to: