On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:26:27AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:12:14PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Stats for the DPL votes: > > |------+------+--------+-------+--------+---------+--------+-----------| > > | | Num | | Valid | Unique | Rejects | % | Multiple | > > | Year | DDs | Quorum | Votes | Voters | | Voting | of Quorum | > > |------+------+--------+-------+--------+---------+--------+-----------| > > | 2015 | 1033 | 48.210 | 364 | 353 | 39 | 34.172 | 7.32206 | > > |------+------+--------+-------+--------+---------+--------+-----------| > > This num DDs seems a bit higher than I'd expect; it looks more like the > number of DDs with active keys + emeritus DDs, rather than the number of > DDs with active keys + number of non-uploading DDs with active keys + > number of DDs with removed 1024 bit keys. > > active DD keys: 751 > active DN keys: 12 > 1024 bit removed DD keys: 220 > emeritus keys: 283 > > So I think quorum is 983. It's possible the number might be one or two > higher as that won't included anyone who is entirely missing a key at > present but such situations are rare. As Phil has pointed out to me, I meant "total voters" here rather than "quorum". J. -- This .sig brought to you by the letter F and the number 26 Product of the Republic of HuggieTag
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature