On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > With my experience of the last weeks, I can just say: without me. I > > won't public those bans in the public, if someone else wants to do > > that: feel free, but please don't count on me. > > FWIW, please note that (at least for me): publishing != announcing. > > I think that bans should be made public --- as in: there exists a public > web page where bans currently in effect are listed. It does not follow > from that that listmasters should mail some public list each time that > page is updated. In fact, I do think that sending announcements about > new/changed bans is a bad idea, that it reinforces the drawbacks of > publishing bans, and that it gives us nothing in terms of additional > transparency. Imho it is not a good idea to publish those bans at all. > > Ideally, the maintenance of that page could be fully automated, on top > of the tools you already use to manage bans. there are no tools. Alex
Attachment:
pgp7__azXyTl_.pgp
Description: PGP signature