[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > With my experience of the last weeks, I can just say: without me. I
> > won't public those bans in the public, if someone else wants to do
> > that: feel free, but please don't count on me.
> FWIW, please note that (at least for me): publishing != announcing.
> I think that bans should be made public --- as in: there exists a public
> web page where bans currently in effect are listed.  It does not follow
> from that that listmasters should mail some public list each time that
> page is updated.  In fact, I do think that sending announcements about
> new/changed bans is a bad idea, that it reinforces the drawbacks of
> publishing bans, and that it gives us nothing in terms of additional
> transparency.
Imho it is not a good idea to publish those bans at all.

> Ideally, the maintenance of that page could be fully automated, on top
> of the tools you already use to manage bans.
there are no tools.


Attachment: pgp7__azXyTl_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: