Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements

To: Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>
Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements
From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:27:23 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20708.10155.458004.970987@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <50DE3684.40007@pocock.com.au>
References: <20622.48956.195581.813347@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <201212281525.14573.holger@layer-acht.org> <50DE3684.40007@pocock.com.au>

Daniel Pocock writes ("Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements"):
> On 28/12/12 15:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I disagree this is a good idea/road but I'm not motivated anymore
> > to discuss this further.
> >
> > Anybody can say anything anyhow and so can the DPL. Extending this
> > blankly and blindly is not wise, IMO.

> Ian's email [1] suggests two possible ways forward:
> 
> a) ensuring open and transparent disclosure (even if identities are
> concealed), which at the very least would "make sure nothing like this
> can ever happen again"

My message was nothing to do with Debconf and I assume Holger's reply
wasn't either.

Ian.

Reply to:

Next by Date: Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements
Next by thread: Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread