Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements
Daniel Pocock writes ("Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements"):
> On 28/12/12 15:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I disagree this is a good idea/road but I'm not motivated anymore
> > to discuss this further.
> > Anybody can say anything anyhow and so can the DPL. Extending this
> > blankly and blindly is not wise, IMO.
> Ian's email  suggests two possible ways forward:
> a) ensuring open and transparent disclosure (even if identities are
> concealed), which at the very least would "make sure nothing like this
> can ever happen again"
My message was nothing to do with Debconf and I assume Holger's reply