Hi, On 11.06.2012 17:26, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > And just thinking about possible complications: I *hope* we don't see > any such behaviour, but this format would allow a DD to "censor" a > given DM's activity. If I send "Deny" actions with somebody's key, it > ends up blocking that person until somebody else is convinced to send > corresponding "Allow" commands. how is that different to the state being? Today, a DD needs to add a DMUA flag, and any DD can do another upload to revoke the DMUA flag again any time. Having that said, this might have happened some times in past, but I don't think we ever had that problem for real. Ansgar is not changing things here, we'd just lower the threshold to actually change something. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature