[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: revenue sharing agreement with DuckDuckGo

On mar., 2012-03-27 at 15:56 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The second option (i.e. the 50% cut) is *not* currently on the table,
> simply because DDG is not the default search engine in web browsers
> shipped by Debian at present. What I'm proposing is to accept the 25%
> cut that will originate from browsers we ship that have DDG as a
> search
> engine option. 

I'm not sure if that counts, but midori uses DDG by default (and
upstream gets some revenue from it).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: