[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: revenue sharing agreement with DuckDuckGo

Philip Hands wrote at 2012-03-27 04:46 -0500:
> On the other hand, I suppose there's some tiny chance that Google will
> be offended, and reduce sponsorship of DebConf, or be less willing to
> give us GSoC projects, say.  If we were being mercenary one might want
> to compare how much money we're likely to get from DDG with the
> potential loss from Google, but as you say, this should be a technical
> decision, so if Google get upset about it, that's not really something
> to be taken into account.

This might be a good reason to go with the 25% option, making DuckDuckGo an 
option but not the default.

Or a user could be required to choose the default search engine when creating 
a new profile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: