On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:21:08PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:14:03AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > >> Am I the only one who has trouble -and getting laughed at- whenever I > >> try to explain these to potential contributors? > >> Can we _at least_ rename the NM process to be indicative of what it > >> is? > > Seconded. > OK, I see a lot of people seconding this (incl. the DPL) and noone > objecting, but I'm not really sure what's the procedure (and the actions > needed) to get this changed. I haven't seen anyone propose a good name that it can be changed *to*. Shouldn't that be the first step? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature