Re: DEP-5: clarify batching of copyrights, licenses in a single stanza
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: DEP-5: clarify batching of copyrights, licenses in a single stanza
- From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:15:19 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1288260919.3333.9.camel@havelock>
- In-reply-to: <878w49qg6r.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- References: <20100814053938.GC2608@dario.dodds.net> <878w49qg6r.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
This is continuing the discussion from 2.5 months ago.
On la, 2010-08-14 at 10:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:13:57PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
>
> >> We should say explicitly that the copyright field is a rollup of all
> >> relevant copyright declarations for that group of files, yes.
>
> > Russ, can you suggest some language around this? "rollup" just conjures
> > images of children's fruit snacks for me. :)
>
> How about this (written without looking at the detailed wording of the
> document, so may need some massaging to fit into the flow):
I think it fits fine with the flow, and would like to propose the
attached patch. The patch also adds a Copyright field in the header
paragraph, which would give the copyright status for the work as a
whole. Assuming I understand what I'm writing, please fact-check.
=== modified file 'dep5.mdwn'
--- dep5.mdwn 2010-09-23 12:40:46 +0000
+++ dep5.mdwn 2010-10-28 10:14:33 +0000
@@ -167,6 +167,15 @@
from a version known to be DFSG-free, even though the current
upstream version is not.
+ * **`Copyright`**
+ * Optional.
+ * Syntax: formatted text, no synopsis
+ * In the header paragraph (no `Files` specification), this field
+ gives the copyright information for the package as a whole, which
+ may be different or simplified from a combination of all the
+ per-file copyright information. See also `Copyright` below in
+ the `Files paragraph` section.
+
Example:
Format: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=file&rev=135
@@ -194,6 +203,24 @@
If a work has no copyright holder (i.e., it is in the public
domain), that information should be recorded here.
+ The Copyright field collects all relevant copyright notices for the
+ files of this stanza. Not all copyright notices may apply to every
+ individual file, and years of publication for one copyright holder may
+ be gathered together. For example, if file A has:
+
+ Copyright 2008 John Smith
+ Copyright 2009 Angela Watts
+
+ and file B has:
+
+ Copyright 2010 Angela Watts
+
+ the Copyright field for a stanza covering both file A and file B need
+ contain only:
+
+ Copyright 2008 John Smith
+ Copyright 2009, 2010 Angela Watts
+
* **`License`**
* Licensing terms for the files listed in **`Files`** field for this paragraph
* Required
Reply to: