Re: [DEP5] [patch] Renaming the ‘Maintainer’ field ‘Contact’
Lars Wirzenius <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On pe, 2010-08-20 at 16:52 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The fact that we're both expressing this in terms of "preference"
>> means, I think, both that this doesn't meet Lars's "wave of opposition"
>> standard and that we're not definitely in bikeshed territory. :) I
>> support Lars in deciding this question one way or the other so we can
>> move on.
> Well, this is hard. There's no clear consensus, so ideally we would
> continue discussion, but this is really a pretty small point, so I'll
> force a decision: I'll keep the Upstream-Contact and Upstream-Name
> fields in the spec.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>