On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:35:50AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Sourceless PDF files are not a violation of the Social Contract / DFSG. If > > you are having to sink time into finding source for such files, let's put an > > end to this - give me the details and I'll propose a GR that reaffirms > > what's stated already in our founding documents, that source code is only > > mandatory for programs. > Just to get this interesting: I've had packages rejected because of > included sourceless PDFs. > Specifically, ttf-gfs-{-didot,-baskerville,-olga,-porson} on 04/04/2008. > Upstream is including a font specimen with their original "tarball" = > zipfile. I asked them for the specimen "source" (like that would do us > any good, being in Adobe Illustrator format et al) but they refused, big > surprise there. What is the upstream zipfile in question? <http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/GFS_DIDOT_TT.zip>, which seems to be the right upstream zipfile, contains only the 6 files included in the ttf-gfs-didot orig.tar.gz. Is <http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/images/Didot%20Specimen.pdf> the file in question? I certainly don't see that this would be a reason for a package reject, but I also don't see any reason you would go out of your way to package this if it's not already part of the upstream source. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature