[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2009-07-30, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> wrote:
>> On 2009-07-30 13:12 (+0200), Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> On 2009-07-30 11:36 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>>> Oh, and Debian got hundreds of active developers, and I doubt they'll
>>>> be running to Shuttleworth anytime soon.
>>> Probably not, but the release synchronization with Ubuntu may make
>>> them feel that they are working for him, which can be a great
>>> demotivation.
>> That's why it would be interesting to hear some concrete ideas how
>> useful this would be for the parties. How pros and cons balance? I'll
>> start:
> Aligning our releases with RHEL rather than with Ubuntu seems more
> worthwhile to me. They have similar stabilisation lengths as we did
> for previous releases and they're investing a lot of work into the
> kernel, from which we could profit immensely.

Ack. Or at least Fedora.

 Bernd Zeimetz                             Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
                   ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Reply to: