[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:17:19PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think that the time framework is large enough not to have a
> > warning.
> One of the reasons I think it would be useful to have warnings is
> that there are other ways in which DDs may be constantly
> contributing (e.g., contributing regularly to a package VCS),
> without *realizing* that they haven't done an upload in x years; so
> perhaps they haven't needed to do any uploads in that time, but
> aren't idle and shouldn't be idled out without warning.

Well, I've no strong objection on that.

Still, I'd prefer not to have to write such specific details on the
text we are going to vote on. I propose to leave such details to DAM /
DSA, would you be fine with that?


Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: