Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 08-04-2009 08:23, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> + Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200):
>>> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>>>> Wouldn't it be just better to point those domains to the respective
>>>>> project-wide efforts? I'd appreciate opinions on the matter.
>>>> Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org,
>>>> $X.debian.net should point to $X.debian.org. (A reasonable exception
>>>> could be www.debian.net containing a list of .debian.net names.)
>>> Implementing this rule would be very appreciated.
>> Adding DSA to the loop to see if this is something they want to
>> standardize or regulate.
> That single rule doesn't scale, there are non-abusive users of clashes
> right now (buildd, www), and it wouldn't solve the backports thing.
That means we should try to push the changes in a similar way we
adopt Policy changes, by convincing people or that we should try
to write the rules and publish them (like DMUP) or vote them
(via GR)? :-)
I'm just wondering if we should discuss more about the rules or
if DSA will propose rules for adoption with some "migration
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----