Re: Yet another list statistics for debian-project
Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> And in the comments on debian-qa, Andreas, you conclude that QA is important
>> and it would be good to see a wider base - but the debian-qa list is only a
>> very small segment of the overall QA activity in Debian, most of which
>> doesn't need centralized coordination...
> At least debian-qa is "maintainer" of an increasing amount of packages
> and I always wonder who is a reliable coworker (is available and avtive
> over a long time period).
Nobody, of course. If debian-qa is "maintainer", that means that the
package is orphaned and doesn't have a maintainer. It's just not buggy
or useless enough to delete it from the archive straight away.
If you expect someone to care for the package other than fixing RC bugs,
I think you're wrong. If someone from the QA team actually offers more
care, that's fine.
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg