[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions

On 11622 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:

> The goal of this GR is still unclear to me, and I would welcome a preamble that
> clearly explains what problem is being solved.

The goal is to change the needed seconds for a GR.

> For the moment I do not know if the problem is the multiplication of
> the amendments in the Lenny GR,


> the fact that the lenny GR could even being started,

No, as the change of the requirements will *not* mean that such a GR
cant be started. Nor should it mean this.

> the fact that an override vote could be started to force a delegate to
> postpone his decisions,

Reread my proposal, I deliberately made that only need half the
seconds than normal GRs.

bye, Joerg
<aj> vorlon: would it be less subtle if we replaced red, green and
     yellow with black, white and a shade of grey?
<vorlon> aj: "and this is what a necrotic port looks like"?
<aj> vorlon: the arch qualification table, halloween edition?
<aj> vorlon: "i heard a faint pinging, and went to the firewall and what
     greeted my eyes? AN m68k RISED FROM THE GRAVE!!!"

Reply to: