Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions
* Ben Finney [Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:43:44 +1100]:
> Don Armstrong <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > You should not be proposing or seconding an option that you don't
> > plan on ranking first.
> This seems quite wrong. Why should one not carefully and precisely
> phrase and propose an option that one does *not* agree with, in order
> to get it voted on?
I can't believe I'm reading this.
You should not write options you are not going to rank first, because
the people who do care about that option winning should get to decide
what's the wording that reflects their complete opinion and concerns.
(On the other hand, I think seconding is different, and that it should
be okay to second stuff even just because "I think it's good for it to
be on the ballot".)
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Que no te vendan amor sin espinas
-- Joaquín Sabina, Noches de boda