Re: DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review)

[Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>]

Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> It works well except when the same package version is in two consecutive
> release.
> 
> 1.0-1+sarge1 > 1.0-1+etch1 when we really want the opposite. That's why
> this scheme was invented. I agree that it's not very nice though but i
> couldn't find anything "cleaner".

Should this be happening? If something warrants a stable update, it certainly
warrants an upload to unstable (which hopefully won't use the +codename1
notation).

-- 

  Felipe Sateler