Re: DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review)
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It works well except when the same package version is in two consecutive
> 1.0-1+sarge1 > 1.0-1+etch1 when we really want the opposite. That's why
> this scheme was invented. I agree that it's not very nice though but i
> couldn't find anything "cleaner".
Should this be happening? If something warrants a stable update, it certainly
warrants an upload to unstable (which hopefully won't use the +codename1