Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:36:17 +0200
Robert Millan <email@example.com> wrote:
> Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
> This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
I have never understood this to be the case. Our codenames refer to
Debian releases. Both non-free and contrib are not in Debian and are
not part of the release. What I've always understood is that the
reason contrib and non-free are labelled 'lenny' is because they are
supposed to work with that release. I can't see that there's
anything troubling about this at all. In fact, I always thought this
was self-evident. Is there really something to be worried over here?