[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DEP1: how to do an NMU

On Monday 02 June 2008, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > No, I don't, I agree with you that this would be unacceptable.
> >
> > Right, and that is where our opinions _do_ differ fundamentally.
> You don't agree that I agree with you?

OK, I misread that. Sorry.

The fundamental thing we disagree on is that you think creating a patch 
and doing an immediate upload to DELAYED is an acceptable workflow for 
any kind of issue. I think that is unacceptable and I think I have made 
my arguments for that clear enough by now.

It is acceptable and appropriate for _some_ cases, but IMO not even for
"most". And there are also some situations - and I'd count almost any 
change to D-I team maintained packages in that - where it is *not* 
acceptable or appropriate in almost _all_ cases.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: