On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:18:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Because bugs may also have been (or seem to have been overlooked). The
> risk here is that the person doing the NMU thinks "oh, that's an old
> issue and the fix seems so simple" and goes ahead and NMUs it, while
> there may be very valid reasons for not fixing it (or at least not with
> _that_ fix).
Then they should have been mentioned in the bug log, shouldn't they?
... and IME they usually *are* for active teams, so I'm not sure I can
buy your argument. I rather conclude that active teams won't risk
anything with the procedure which is being proposed, while not active
teams will see NMUs, as they should.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature