One small typo fix. diff is attached.
And a question on the following text:
* Each infrastructure team has to accept at least two valid candidates
every two years.
* Each infrastructure team has not added any new members according to
the rule above, but has had to mark at least two members as latent
in the same period, has to accept at least one new valid candidate.
I don't understand the logic here. The first point states that teams
must add two valid candidates in a given 2 year period. The second
point assumes that a given team has not added new members as required
previously, and has removed two inactive members. What is the point of
the second rule? The first already states that two members should be
added. If the intent is to state that a team that removes two inactive
members must *immediately* add at least one new member to compensate,
then perhaps that could be stated more clearly?
noah
--- infrastructureteamprocedures.txt.orig 2008-04-14 15:22:27.000000000 -0400
+++ infrastructureteamprocedures.txt 2008-04-14 15:22:55.000000000 -0400
@@ -94,9 +94,9 @@
their responsibilities.
* Each infrastructure team has to accept at least two valid candidates
every two years.
- * Each infrastructure team has not added any new members according to
- the rule above, but has had to mark at least two members as latent
- in the same period, has to accept at least one new valid candidate.
+ * Each infrastructure team that has not added any new members according to
+ the rule above, but has had to mark at least two members as latent in the
+ same period, has to accept at least one new valid candidate.
* Infrastructure teams should ensure that they don't have too many members.
The basic requirements for this are:
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature