On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 02:32:05AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org> wrote: [...] > > As most developers (me included) are not very much aware of the status of the > > Debian trademark I believe it would be interesting to add a page to the > > website that described more information about the Debian trademark and have > > that linked from the footnote "Debian is a registered trademark of Software > > in the Public Interest, Inc." in a similar way as to how the website's > > license is. [...] > > Please expand /license rather than making a new page just for this. > Already our image licensing is split across two pages (/license and > /logos/), which is one too many, in my opinion. I'm not 100% sure this is a good idea. Wouldn't that help people get (more) confused about licenses/copyrights vs. trademarks? The license page is currently very simple and to the point, it documents the license of the _web_ pages. The trademark page I proposed is more convoluted and descriptive and goes beyond the website license. Adding that and keeping the name 'license' of the URL is misleading as more text will be devoted to the trademark than to the license itself. However, currently, the 'license' page has some information on the trademark. So I would change it to point to this page (if kept separate). I'm open to suggestions, however, if more people feel they should be together I will commit it as a patch to the license page. Anyone? > I second the comments of others about using modern markup. Will do. It seems I need a refreshing HTML course. > I would change the early headings into only two: Good. Will do. Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature