Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
Allright. I'll take the first preference, mine, and attempt to convince maintainers that it's right since it didn't involve voting.On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 03:28:41PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:Christian chose suite before I posted ""suite" vs "branch"". From an IRC discussion we had later, he was ambivalent between the two terms.Pierre Habouzit a écrit :Yet "more discussion" is currently equal with "suite" on the poll. So please vote, rather than $PICK_YOUR_JARGON_TERM.IOW: We just don't need to bring this up _again_.Voting is a pretty poor way to determine proper terminology.
Like which one? I checked the list of non-pending, non-patched and non-"new" RC bugs and found these:Fwiw, dak has always used 'suite', and speaking for myself, I'm disinclined to change terminology unless there's pretty good reason why to do so. Anyway, I fully agree with Pierre in this; how about fixing some RC bugs?
libkwiki-perl #411027. Not interested, should probably be removed.jasper #413041. Upstream security bug that should affect stable. Not actually RC.
mozilla-tabextensions #412314. Not interested, should be removed.redhat-cluster #412862 / #411787. Not interested, should probably be removed. zope-cachefu #411093 and zope3 #411472. Not interested. Unfortunate, but may be removed, so not actually RC.
That only leaves openbsd-inetd, with which I may try helping, although I don't use inetd so I'm not best placed.