[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Two GR concepts for dicussion

On 18:37 Thu 31 May     , Anthony Towns wrote:

Hi Anthony,

> 	- minimal requirements: gpg keyring signed by either one or two
> 	  developers, recommendation by a developer, use of existing
> 	  fields such as "Maintainer:" and "Uploaders:" to control access,
> 	  no provision for uploaders to do NMUs or upload NEW packages etc

I think the use of an existing fields "Maintainer" should do the job but Im not
in favour of "Uploaders". Im throught the NM process and member of the parted
team so Im in the uploaders field. If I will have this kind of right, I could be
able to upload a new version of parted and maybe then broke the d-i for exemple.

So for the "Maintainer" field, ok, but for "uploader" we should maybe need to 
take care about what are the packages co-maintained and if they are 'critical'.
We could maybe check the "Section" field and only allow some of them for a DM.

  ,''`.  Xavier Oswald <x.oswald@free.fr>
 : :' :  GNU/LINUX Debian & Debian-Edu 
 `. `'   GnuPG Key ID 0x88BBB51E 
   `-    938D D715 6915 8860 9679  4A0C A430 C6AA 88BB B51E

Reply to: