[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Jury (was Re: Two GR concepts for dicussion)

Hey, why not? A third idea: instead of having delegates or a committee
or whatever to decide amongst disputes, how about randomly selecting a
jury from DDs and having their word (on who's right, on what punishment
is plausible) be absolutely final, with no appeal, ever?
I don't like it at first read, but you may provide examples of situations where such a procedure could be useful. In particular, just determining "who's right" doesn't help much. As for determining what punishments are plausible, isn't this better done by a committee specialized in the Constitution?

Reply to: