Re: BREAKING NEWS: Debian developers aren't trusted
* Anthony Towns <email@example.com> [2007-02-15 09:37]:
> Not every criticism is an insult, and if you want to know why things
> don't happen you need to be able to take criticism without taking insult.
To some readers of your last mail
> In general, I could pretty easily imagine a buildd that fails every
> one of those points still being suitable for a non-release arch for
> two years.
could be read as an answer to
> > i think someone running more than one autobuilder for more than
> > _two_ years now (okay, not for the officical archive, but i see that
> > as nonrelevant here) demonstrats very good that he mets your
> > mentioned technical constraints.
and therefore understood in the way that you don't think Martin complies
to the points give.
http://martin.wuertele.net/ -- Debian -- OFTC -- SPI -- firstname.lastname@example.org
(...) Doch wenn ich den 2.4.18-SMP Kernel booten will, dann geht es in
3 von 2 Fällen nicht.
-- Dennis Zimmermann, at.linux