Re: package ownership in Debian
* Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> [060801 14:25]:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:58:57AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > * Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> [060731 19:52]:
> > > I completely understand your point - but still, it still places an
> > > unnecessary burden. Often, when I do NMUs it is because I found a
> > > bug I can fix _and_ because I found some available time to work on
> > > it. Of course, I don't want to step on your feet, so I ask for your
> > > permission and upload to -delayed - and then go on with my
> > > business. If I must remember a week later to re-ping for your
> > > permission, I might just forget about the bug completely.
> >
> > And who looks after a week into the buildd logs and if perhaps
> > some arch failed to build because something changed in one of
> > the build dependencies?
>
> Isn't that what we have buildd maintainers for?
I don't know exactly, but I was under the impression the buildd admins do
not waste their time with anything obviously not caused by their buildd or
their architecture.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
Reply to: