Peter Samuelson wrote: > The point of maintaining a package is to prove that you *can* maintain > a package. Being on a team proves nothing. Being on a team and doing > most of the work proves something, if this can be measured, but that's > difficult. As it happens, I'm on at least one team where I do a > majority of the work, and at least one team in name only (haven't yet > done *any* work). I don't particularly expect to be judged favorably > for the one or unfavorably for the other, because it's just too hard to > get the data. My experience with participating in teams in Debian suggests that the NM people give a lot of weight to recommendations about team members, and that working with someone in a team gives a much better feel for their skill set and overall suitability than installing some package they put together, and leads to more detailed and strong recommendations to NM. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature