On Wednesday 09 August 2006 17:03, Anthony Towns wrote: [publish decisions about where money goes] > Hrm. I don't know if we should do the "announce publicly" requirement > yet -- that would make most of the expenses we've actually done over > the past few years unconstitutional. Past expenses where handled as the current constitution allows. I actually saw that part as an improvement in the sense of making more of the day to day activities of the project visible. It needn't be d-d-a or d-news, and I'd interpret the section to allow the DPL to include this publication as a 'btw, we bought some disks for ...' sidenote in his monthly/bits/for those who care about... reports. I think writing three words about authorized purchases is not that much work. cheers -- vbi -- Bad or missing mouse driver. Spank the cat [Y/N]?
Attachment:
pgpvElFBv0QHT.pgp
Description: PGP signature