Re: IRC debate feedback

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IRC debate feedback
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:43:39 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zmx1d8z8.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-project@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 42382088.4040606@yahoo.co.uk> (Helen Faulkner's message of "Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:03:20 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 42382088.4040606@yahoo.co.uk>

Hi,

        I really liked the format of the debate, and I think that
 despite the popularity of the second hour's free wheeling debate, the
 structured first hour,along with carefully chosen questiosn, gives a
 better idea of the candidates policies, and responses to unusual
 scenarios. The second half needs the anchor of the policies described
 in the first half; lacking that, people would still have been
 wondering where the candidates stood.

	I would notr change the format; the extempore part's
 popularity notwithstanding.

	manoj
-- 
'Scuse me, while I kiss the sky! Robert James Marshall (Jimi) Hendrix
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

References:
- IRC debate feedback
  - From: Helen Faulkner <helen_ml_faulkner@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: IRC debate feedback
Next by Date: Bits from the ftpmaster team
Previous by thread: Re: IRC debate feedback
Next by thread: Re: IRC debate feedback
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread