Re: documentation x executable code
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:08:57PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Let's just list the 9 points of the DFSG:
>
> Free Redistribution
> Source Code (ie, it has to have it)
> Derived Works (ie, the right to create them)
> Integrity of The Author's Source Code (patch files and forced renamings
> are ok)
> No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups
> No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
> Distribution of License
> License Must Not Be Specific to Debian
> License Must Not Contaminate Other Software
which of these 9 points does the GFDL not meet?
craig
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au> (part time cyborg)
Reply to: